‘I¨Œ¤‹†›“‘è

@
Žö‰Û‘åj ‰ºÚ

‘æˆêT(2/25)FIntroduction

‘æ“ñT(3/4)FHistorical Perspectives u‹`

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., William G. Jacoby, Helmut Norpoth and Herbert Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan University Press. Pp. 3-18 ‘S•¶

Heath, Anthony, Stephen Fisher, and Shawna Smith. 2005. gThe Globalization of Public Opinion research.h Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 297-333. ‘S•¶

‘æŽOT(3/11)FTheoretical Approaches to the Study of Voting Behavior u‹`

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., William G. Jacoby, Helmut Norpoth and Herbert Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan University Press. Pp. 19-28. ‘S•¶

Arzheimer, Kai and Jocelyn Evans. 2008. The Evolving Study of Electoral Behavior.h In Electoral Behavior, Vol. I, eds. Kai Arzheimer and Jocelyn Evans. London: Sage. Pp. xix-xlvii. ‘S•¶

Heath, Anthony. 2007. gPerspectives on Electoral Behavior.h In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 610-620. ‘S•¶

‘æŽlT(3/18)FThe Nature of Public Opinion u‹`

Kinder, Donald R. 2003. gBelief System after Converse.h In Electoral Democracy, eds. Michael B. MacKuen and George Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Pp: 13-47. ‘S•¶ “E—v

Kuklinski, James H. and Buddy Peyton. 2007. gBelief Systems and Political Decision Making.h In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 45-64. ‘S•¶ “E—v

‘æŒÜT(3/25)FVoting Turnout u‹`

Niemi, Richard G. and Herbert F. Weisberg, 2001. gWhy Is Voter Turnout Low( And Why Is It Decline)?. In Controversies in Voting Behavior, 4nd eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D. C.: CQ Press. Pp. 22-37. ‘S•¶ “E—v

Dettrey, Bryan and Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer. 2009. gVoter Turnout in Presidential Democracies.h Comparative Political Studies, 41(10): 1317-1338. ‘S•¶ “E—v

‘æ˜ZT(4/1)FParty Identity and its Change

Holmberg, Soren. 2007. gPartisanship Reconsidered.h In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 557-570. ‘S•¶ “E—v

Erickson, Robert S., Michael B MAcKuen and James A. Stimson. 2001. gMacropartisanship: The Permanent Memory of Partisan Evaluation.h In Controversies in Voting Behavior, 4nd eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D. C.: CQ Press. Pp364-370. ‘S•¶

‘掵T(4/8)F›“‘艉u

ԾӻT(4/15)FIssue Voting

Shank, Merrill. 2001. gWhat about Issues?h In Election Studies: Whatfs Their Use? eds. Elihu Katz and Yael Warshel. Boulder: Westview Press. Pp173-217. ‘S•¶ “E—v

Macdonald, Stuart E., George Rabinnowitz, and Holly Brasher. 2003. gPolicy Issues and Electoral Democracy.h In Electoral Democracy, eds. Michael B. MacKuen and George Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Pp: 172-99. ‘S•¶ “E—v

‘æ‹ãT(4/22)F›“‘艉u

‘æ\T(4/29)FCandidate Evaluation

Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan. 1990. gA Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal.h In Controversies in Voting Behavior, 2nd eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D. C.: CQ Press. Pp187-206. ‘S•¶ “E—v

Erickson, Robert S. Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch. 1. ‘S•¶

‘æ\ˆêT(5/6)FSocial Cleavages

Evans, Geoffrey. 2000. "The Continued Significance of Class Voting." Annual Review of Political Science, 3: 401-17. ‘S•¶

Inglehart, Ronald and Paul R. Abramson. 1994. gEconomic Security and Value Change.h American Political Science Review, 88(2): 336-54. ‘S•¶

‘æ\“ñT(5/13)FTicket Splitting and Strategic Voting

Burden, Barry C. and David C. Kimball. 2001. A New Approach to the Study of Divided Government.h In Controversies in Voting Behavior, 4nd eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D. C.: CQ Press. Pp301-321. ‘S•¶

Abramson et al. 2010. gComparing Strategic Voting under FPTP and PR.h Comparative Political Studies, 43(1): 61-90. ‘S•¶

‘æ\ŽOT(5/20) Dealignment, Realignment, and Cleavage Mobilization

Miller, Warren and Norman Schofield. 2003. gActivists and Partisan Realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review 97: 245-60. ‘S•¶

  Mayhew, David R.2000. gElectoral Realignment.h Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 3, Pp. 449-474. ‘S•¶

‘æ\ŽlT(5/27)F Party Nationalization

Morgenstern, Scott, Stephen M. Swindle, and Andrea Castanola. 2009. gParty Nationalization and Institutions.h Journal of Politics, 71(4): 1322-1341. ‘S•¶

Kasuya, Yuko and Johannes Moenius. 2008. gThe Nationalization of Party SystemFConceptual issues and alternative district-focused measures.h Electoral Studies27(1)F126-135B ‘S•¶

Ծ\ΆT(6/3)FElectoral Rules(I): Plurality-Majority system verse PR system

Cusack, Thomas R. Torben Iversen, and David Soskice. 2007. gEconomic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems.h American Political Science Review, 101(3): 373-391. ‘S•¶

Grofman, Bernard and Arend Lijphart. 1986. Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press Inc. Ch. 1-3.    ‘S•¶

‘æ\˜ZT(6/10)FElectoral Rules(II): The STV and SNTV

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. gSNTV and STV Compared: Their Political Consequences in Japan, Ireland, and Malta.h In Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution, eds. Bernard er al. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Pp. 289-99. ‘S•¶

Reed, Steven R. and John M. Bolland. 1999. g The Fragementation of SNTV in Japan.h In Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution, eds. Bernard er al. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Pp. 211-26. ‘S•¶

‘æ\޵T(6/17)FElectoral Rules(III): Mixed Electoral Systems

Maeda, K.2008.gRe-examining the contamination effect of Japanfs mixed electoral system using the treatment-effects model.hElectoral Studies 27(4)F723-731. ‘S•¶

Shugart, Matthew S. and Martin P. Wattenberg. 2001. gIntroduction: The Electoral Reform of the Twenty-First Century?h In Mixed-Member Electoral System: The Best of Both World? Eds. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1-24. ‘S•¶

Shugart, Matthew S. and Martin P. Wattenberg. 2001. gConclusion: Are Mixed-Member Systems the Best of Both World?h In Mixed-Member Electoral System: The Best of Both World? Eds. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 571-96. ‘S•¶

‘æ\”ªT(6/24)F 繳ŒðŠú––•ñ

@

․•¶Í‹Ï›ß‰Á–§C–§áù¿Š†˜VŽtˆ½•‹³B

@

@

@

@

@

@

@


Copyright ”Ş܊—L”ñãS“¯ˆÓ¿–ÜçzÚ