Žö‰Û‘åj
‰ºÚ
‘æˆêT(2/25)FIntroduction
ԾҖT(3/4)FHistorical
Perspectives
u‹`
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., William G. Jacoby, Helmut
Norpoth and Herbert Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited.
Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan University Press. Pp. 3-18
‘S•¶
Heath, Anthony, Stephen Fisher, and Shawna Smith.
2005. gThe Globalization of Public Opinion research.h Annual
Review of Political Science, 8: 297-333. ‘S•¶
‘æŽOT(3/11)FTheoretical
Approaches to the Study of Voting Behavior
u‹`
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., William G. Jacoby, Helmut
Norpoth and Herbert Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited.
Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan University Press. Pp. 19-28.
‘S•¶
Arzheimer, Kai and Jocelyn Evans. 2008. The
Evolving Study of Electoral Behavior.h In Electoral Behavior,
Vol. I, eds. Kai Arzheimer and Jocelyn Evans. London: Sage. Pp.
xix-xlvii.
‘S•¶
Heath, Anthony. 2007. gPerspectives on Electoral
Behavior.h In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds.
Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford
University Press. Pp. 610-620. ‘S•¶
‘æŽlT(3/18)FThe
Nature of Public Opinion
u‹`
Kinder, Donald R. 2003. gBelief System after
Converse.h In Electoral Democracy, eds. Michael B. MacKuen
and George Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Pp: 13-47.
‘S•¶
“E—v
Kuklinski, James H. and Buddy Peyton. 2007.
gBelief Systems and Political Decision Making.h In The Oxford
Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Russell J. Dalton and
Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp.
45-64. ‘S•¶
“E—v
ԾΆT(3/25)FVoting
Turnout
u‹`
Niemi, Richard G. and Herbert F. Weisberg, 2001.
gWhy Is Voter Turnout Low( And Why Is It Decline)?. In
Controversies in Voting Behavior, 4nd eds. Richard G. Niemi and
Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D. C.: CQ Press. Pp. 22-37.
‘S•¶
“E—v
Dettrey, Bryan and Leslie A.
Schwindt-Bayer. 2009. gVoter Turnout in Presidential Democracies.h
Comparative Political Studies, 41(10): 1317-1338. ‘S•¶
“E—v
‘æ˜ZT(4/1)FParty
Identity and its Change
Holmberg, Soren. 2007. gPartisanship
Reconsidered.h In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior,
eds. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford
University Press. Pp. 557-570.
‘S•¶
“E—v
Erickson, Robert S., Michael B MAcKuen and James
A. Stimson. 2001. gMacropartisanship: The Permanent Memory of
Partisan Evaluation.h In Controversies in Voting Behavior,
4nd eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D.
C.: CQ Press. Pp364-370.
‘S•¶
‘掵T(4/8)F›“‘艉u
ԾӻT(4/15)FIssue
Voting
Shank, Merrill. 2001. gWhat about Issues?h In
Election Studies: Whatfs Their Use? eds. Elihu Katz and Yael
Warshel. Boulder: Westview Press. Pp173-217.
‘S•¶
“E—v
Macdonald, Stuart E., George Rabinnowitz, and
Holly Brasher. 2003. gPolicy Issues and Electoral Democracy.h In
Electoral Democracy, eds. Michael B. MacKuen and George
Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Pp:
172-99. ‘S•¶
“E—v
‘æ‹ãT(4/22)F›“‘艉u
‘æ\T(4/29)FCandidate
Evaluation
Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida,
and John L. Sullivan. 1990. gA Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate
Appraisal.h In Controversies in Voting Behavior, 2nd eds.
Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D. C.: CQ
Press. Pp187-206.
‘S•¶
“E—v
Erickson, Robert S. Michael B. MacKuen, and James
A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. Ch. 1.
‘S•¶
‘æ\ˆêT(5/6)FSocial
Cleavages
Evans, Geoffrey. 2000. "The Continued
Significance of Class Voting." Annual Review of Political Science,
3: 401-17.
‘S•¶
Inglehart, Ronald and Paul R. Abramson. 1994.
gEconomic Security and Value Change.h American Political Science
Review, 88(2): 336-54.
‘S•¶
‘æ\“ñT(5/13)FTicket
Splitting and Strategic Voting
Burden, Barry C. and David C.
Kimball. 2001. A New Approach to the Study of Divided Government.h
In Controversies in Voting Behavior,
4nd eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington, D.
C.: CQ Press. Pp301-321.
‘S•¶
Abramson et al. 2010. gComparing Strategic Voting
under FPTP and PR.h Comparative Political Studies, 43(1):
61-90.
‘S•¶
‘æ\ŽOT(5/20)
Dealignment, Realignment, and Cleavage Mobilization
Miller, Warren and Norman Schofield. 2003.
gActivists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.
American Political Science Review 97: 245-60.
‘S•¶
Mayhew, David R.2000. gElectoral Realignment.h
Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 3, Pp. 449-474.
‘S•¶
‘æ\ŽlT(5/27)F
Party Nationalization
Morgenstern, Scott,
Stephen M. Swindle, and Andrea Castanola. 2009. gParty
Nationalization and Institutions.h Journal of Politics,
71(4): 1322-1341.
‘S•¶
Kasuya, Yuko and Johannes Moenius. 2008. gThe
Nationalization of Party SystemFConceptual
issues and alternative district-focused measures.h Electoral
Studies27(1)F126-135B
‘S•¶
Ծ\ΆT(6/3)FElectoral
Rules(I): Plurality-Majority system verse PR system
Cusack, Thomas R. Torben Iversen, and David
Soskice. 2007. gEconomic Interests and the Origins of Electoral
Systems.h American Political Science Review, 101(3): 373-391.
‘S•¶
Grofman, Bernard and Arend Lijphart. 1986.
Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York:
Agathon Press Inc. Ch. 1-3.
‘S•¶
‘æ\˜ZT(6/10)FElectoral
Rules(II): The STV and SNTV
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. gSNTV and STV Compared:
Their Political Consequences in Japan, Ireland, and Malta.h In
Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single
Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded
Institution, eds. Bernard er al. Ann Arbor: The University of
Michigan Press. Pp. 289-99.
‘S•¶
Reed, Steven R. and John M. Bolland. 1999. g The
Fragementation of SNTV in Japan.h In Elections in Japan, Korea,
and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative
Study of an Embedded Institution, eds. Bernard er al. Ann Arbor:
The University of Michigan Press. Pp. 211-26.
‘S•¶
‘æ\޵T(6/17)FElectoral
Rules(III): Mixed Electoral Systems
Maeda, K.2008.gRe-examining
the contamination effect of Japanfs
mixed electoral system using the treatment-effects model.hElectoral
Studies 27(4)F723-731.
‘S•¶
Shugart, Matthew S. and Martin P. Wattenberg.
2001. gIntroduction: The Electoral Reform of the Twenty-First
Century?h In Mixed-Member Electoral System: The Best of Both
World? Eds. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg. New
York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1-24.
‘S•¶
Shugart, Matthew S. and Martin P. Wattenberg.
2001. gConclusion: Are Mixed-Member Systems the Best of Both World?h
In Mixed-Member Electoral System: The Best of Both World?
Eds. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg. New York: Oxford
University Press. Pp. 571-96.
‘S•¶
Ծ\ӻT(6/24)F
繳ŒðŠú––•ñ
@
․•¶Í‹Ï›ß‰Á–§C–§áù¿Š†˜VŽtˆ½•‹³B @ @ @ @ @ @ @
|