國立臺灣大學文學院教師評鑑辦法施行細則

Implementation Details of the Faculty Evaluation Regulations,

College of Liberal Arts, National Taiwan University

89 年12 月27 日89 學年度第1 學期第1 次文學院院務會議通過

90 年1 月9 日第2179 次行政會議修正通過

92 年6 月20 日91 學年度第2 學期第2 次文學院院務會議修正通過

92 年10 月7 日第2311 次行政會議修正通過

93 年12 月22 日93 學年度第1 學期第2 次文學院院務會議修正通過

94 年1 月25 日第2374 次行政會議通過

95 年6 月21 日94 學年度第2 學期第3 次文學院務會議修正通過

95 年8 月15 日第2444 次行政會議通過

96 年6 月6 日95 學年度第2 學期第2 次文學院務會議通過

96 年7 月17 日第2488 次行政會議修正通過

97 年1 月9 日96 學年度第1 學期第2 次文學院務會議通過

97 年1 月22 日第2510 次行政會議通過

100年1月5日99 學年度第1 學期第4次院務會議修正通過

100年1月25日第2655次行政會議修正通過並自100年2月9日文學院（100）發字第9號函發布施行

100年6月1日99學年度第2學期第2次文學院院務會議修正通過
100年6月21日第2674次行政會議通過並自100年7月4日文學院（100）發字第65號函發布施行

102年6月5日101學年度第2學期第2次文學院務會議修正通過
102年7月2日第2769次行政會議通過並自102年7月15 日文學院（102）發字第69號函發布施行
103年1月9日102學年度第1學期第2次院務會議通過

103年2月18日第2799次行政會議通過並自103年2月26日文學院（103）發字第14號函發布施行

Amended on January 9, 2014 at the 2nd Collegiate Affairs Meeting of Liberal Arts

Passed on February 18, 2014 at the University’s Administrative Meeting

Effective from February 28, 2014 upon the announcement of the Liberal Arts College

Article 1  

本施行細則依「國立臺灣大學文學院教師評鑑辦法」第十條訂定之。

The implementation details are established in accordance to the Article 10 of the “Faculty Evaluation Regulations of the College of Liberal Arts, National Taiwan University.”

Article 2  

各系、所、學位學程應彙整受評鑑教師之學術著作、教學、服務等相關資料，送請本院評鑑小組評鑑。

Each department, graduate institute, and degree program should compile all their faculty’s academic works and relevant data on teaching and service into a Dossier and submit the Dossier to the College Evaluation Committee for evaluation. 

第三條 

Article 3  

評鑑分資料評分及評鑑委員評分兩部份。按研究、教學、服務三項，各以滿分一百分評定，再依一般教師研究佔60%，教學佔30%，服務佔10%計算；語言教師研究佔20%，教學佔70%，服務佔10%計算；擔任教學專任專業技術人員評鑑之項目及其所佔百分比如下：研究20%，教學50%，服務佔30%。 以上各項總和佔最後總分70%。

評鑑委員依前項比例評定之分數佔最後總分30%。以最後總分七十五分為標準，議決是否通過。

There are two separate reviews: The Dossier Evaluation (70%) and Review by the College Evaluation Committee (30%).  Each evaluation will target three areas: Research, Teaching, and Service.  Each area is worth a maximum of 100 points.  For the GENERAL FACULTY not under the category of LANGUAGE TEACHER, the final score is tallied based on the following formula: Research (60%), Teaching (30%), and Service (10%).  For LANGUAGE TEACHERS, the formula is: Teaching (70%), Research (20%), and Service (10%).  For full-time TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS in charge of teaching,  the formula is: Service (20%), Teaching (50%), and Research (30%) . (Note that these formulas apply to both the Dossier Evaluation and the College Evaluation Committee Review).

The score of the first (Dossier) review constitutes 70% of the final College evaluation score, while the result of the College Evaluation Committee Review makes up the rest 30%.  The standard passing score is 75 points (the Dossier Evaluation + the score given by the Collegiate Evaluation Committee), and the resolution will be made based on this standard.

Article 4  

資料評分，採依據基本分，累進計算方式。

The scores on Dossier Evaluation are given according to a “base score” plus “accumulated scores”. 

資料評分之研究項目，依其著作發表期刊之分級，擇其最優一篇，採計其基本分如下：

A級 （一級）60分，B級 （二級）50分，C級 （三級）40分。此外，每增A級一篇，加20分；每增B級一篇，加10分；每增C級一篇，加5分，計算以到滿分為止。
　

The RESEARCH performance of the Dossier Evaluation is scored based on the following standards: one superlative journal article is selected and a base score is given according to the category of the journal:

60 points for A-level journals, 50 points for B-level journals, and 40 points for C-level journals.  Each additional A-level article is given 20 points, each additional B-level article is given 10 points, and each additional C-level article is given 5 points, calculated until the full score is reached.

論著獲國科會獎助，視同A級；國科會傑出研究獎論著，視同A級兩篇。其他學術著作，如專書、論文集、學術性書評、翻譯、文學創作、藝文展演等之分級，依各系 、所、學位學程明訂辦法處理。

Works which have received awards from the National Science Council are considered as A-level journal articles.  Works which receive the “Distinguished” Research Award from the National Science Council are considered as two A-level journal articles.  The grading of other scholarly works such as books, collections of essays, academic book reviews, translations, creative writings, and art performances will be determined according to the regulations made by each department, graduate institute, and degree program.

個人單著或與另一作者合著之學術專書（含論文集、通論性專書、大專教科書、學術翻譯）視同A級期刊論文一篇，若經系、所、學位學程相關會議認定，最高得採計A 級二篇。其他非期刊論文之學術著作與翻譯、創作文類之分級，依各系、所、學位學程明訂辦法辦理。

Each single-authored or co-authored scholarly book (including volumes of essays, general scholarly guides and introductions, college-level textbooks, scholarly translations, etc.) counts as ONE A-level essay or as maximum TWO A-level essays, the latter subject to approval by relevant Department, Graduate Program, and Degree Program committees. All other scholarly publications, i.e., those falling outside of the scholarly essay category, such as other translations and creative works, shall be evaluated in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of respective Departments, Graduate Programs, and Degree Programs.

藝術相關系、所、學位學程得依教育部訂定「專科以上學校教師資格審定辦法」之精神，擬定作品及成就證明之分級標準，比照評分。

Art and art-related departments, graduate institutes, and degree programs can establish grading standards for works and performances according to the Ministry of Education’s “Regulations of Qualification Evaluation for Teachers above the Technical School Level.”

Article 5  

資料評分之教學項目，以教學時數與教學評鑑兩項分別計分，平均計算，得其總分。
　

The TEACHING performance of the Dossier Evaluation is scored based on the following formula: Teaching Hours (50%), Student Evaluations (50%). 

教學時數計分，以每週實際授課時數，依教授8小時，副教授9小時，助理教授9小時，講師10小時為標準，獲70分之基本分，每多1小時加10分。擔任導師加20分；指導研究生加20分，第二人起每增一人加10分，以上各項總和，計算以到滿分為止。教學時數，以評鑑期間各學期之平均分數為其評分。獲本校教學傑出獎者，自獲獎當年度起5年，每學年教學評 鑑之基本分為100分；獲本校教學優良獎者，該學年教學評鑑之基本分為90分，各項總和，計算以到滿分為止。

For TEACHING HOURS, a base score of 70 is given to any faculty member who meets the contractually required minimum hours: 8 weekly teaching hours for full professors, 9 for associate and assistant professors, and 10 for instructors.  10 points are added for every extra hour taught.  Additional 20 points are given for serving as student advisors.  Additional 20 points are given for supervising a graduate student, with additional 10 points for supervising each extra graduate student.  The sum of the above items is calculated until the full score of 100 points is reached.  The final score is the average of all semester scores during the evaluation period. Recipients of the University’s Distinguished (傑出) Teaching Award are given a base score of 100 points for 5 consecutive academic years dating from the year when one receives the award while recipients of the University’s Excellent (優良) Teaching Award are given a base score of 90 for the school year.  The sum of all items is calculated until the full score of 100 points is reached.

教學評鑑，以評鑑總平均值3，為獲70分之基本分，每增減0.1得增減2分，計算以到滿分為止。教學評鑑以評鑑期間所有課程評鑑之平均分數為其評分。

For STUDENT EVALUATIONS, a base score of 70 is given to the evaluation average score of 3.  Two points are added to the base score for an extra of 0.1 evaluation average while Two points are deducted for an minus of 0.1 evaluation average, and the sum is calculated until the full score of 100 points is reached.  The final score is the average of all semester courses evaluations during the evaluation period. 

Article 6  

資料評分之服務項目，以一項為基本分70分；每增一項多10分，計算以到滿分為止。

The SERVICE performance of the Dossier Evaluation is scored based on the following criteria: one item of service translates into a base score of 70 points.  Each extra item translates into an additional 10 points until the full score is reached.

Article 7  

本細則規定未盡事宜，依照本院教師評鑑辦法及本校有關規定處理。

If there are matters not covered by these details, they should be dealt with according to the Faculty Evaluation Regulations of the College and other relevant regulations of the University.

Article 8  

本細則經本院院務會議及本校行政會議通過後，自發布日施行。

After these implementing details are approved by the Collegiate Affairs Meeting and the University's Administrative Meeting, they then come into effect from the day of promulgation.