學院 |
醫學院 |
系所 |
職能治療學系 |
題名 |
Comparison
of proximal versus distal upper-limb robotic rehabilitation on motor
performance after stroke: a cluster controlled trial |
作者 |
Hsieh, Y-W., Lin,
K-C., Wu, C-Y.*, Shih, T-Y., Li, M-W., Chen, C-L. |
期刊名稱 |
Scientific Reports (SCIE 期刊) |
發表日期 |
2018 |
著作性質 |
原著 |
語文 |
英文 |
關鍵字 |
|
摘要 |
This
study examined the treatment efficacy of proximal-emphasized robotic
rehabilitation by using the InMotion ARM (P-IMT) versus distal-emphasized
robotic rehabilitation by using the InMotion WRIST (D-IMT) in patients with
stroke. A total of 40 patients with stroke completed the study. They received
P-IMT, D-IMT, or control treatment (CT) for 20 training sessions. Primary
outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Medical Research Council
(MRC) scale. Secondary outcomes were the Motor Activity Log (MAL) and
wrist-worn accelerometers. The differences on the distal FMA, total MRC,
distal MRC, and MAL quality of movement scores among the 3 groups were
statistically significant (P = 0.02 to 0.05). Post hoc comparisons revealed
that the D-IMT group significantly improved more than the P-IMT group on the
total MRC and distal MRC. Furthermore, the distal FMA and distal MRC improved
more in the D-IMT group than in the CT group. Our findings suggest that
distal upper-limb robotic rehabilitation using the InMotion WRIST system had
superior effects on distal muscle strength. Further research based on a
larger sample is needed to confirm long-term treatment effects of proximal
versus distal upper-limb robotic rehabilitation. |