學院 |
醫學院 |
系所 |
職能治療學系 |
題名 |
Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial |
作者 |
Wu, C-Y., Hung, P-C., Chen, Y-T., Lin, K-C.*, & Yang, H-W. |
期刊名稱 |
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (SCI 期刊) |
發表日期 |
2013 |
著作性質 |
原著 |
語文 |
英文 |
關鍵字 |
Stroke; Mirror therapy; Motor skills;
Sensation; Activities of daily living |
摘要 |
Objective:
To compare the effects of mirror therapy (MT) vs. control treatment (CT) on
movement performance, motor control, sensory recovery, and performance of
activities of daily living in people with chronic
stroke. Design:
Single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Setting:
Four hospitals. Participants:
Thirty-three outpatients with chronic stroke, with mild to moderate motor
impairment. Interventions:
The MT group (n = 16) received upper extremity training involving repetitive
bimanual, symmetrical movement practice in which the individual moves the
affected limb while watching the reflective illusion of the unaffected limb's
movements from a mirror. The CT group received task-oriented upper extremity
training. The intensity for both groups was 1.5 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4
weeks. Main
Outcome Measurements: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA); kinematic variables,
including reaction time, normalized movement time, normalized total
displacement, joint recruitment, and maximum shoulder-elbow
cross-correlation; the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA), the
Motor Activity Log (MAL), and the ABILHAND Questionnaire. Results:
The MT group performed better in the overall (p = 0.01) and distal part (p =
0.04) FMA scores and demonstrated shorter reaction time (p = 0.04), shorter
normalized total displacement (p = 0.04), and greater maximum
shoulder-elbow cross-correlation (p = 0.03). The rNSA temperature scores
improved significantly more in the MT group than in the CT group. No
significant differences on the MAL and ABILHAND were found immediately after
MT or at follow-up. Conclusions:
The application of MT after stroke might result in beneficial effects on
movement performance, motor control, and temperature sense but may not
translate into daily functions in the chronic stroke population. |