34. Phonological rules for English plurals and more
There are three rules for forming regular plurals in English,
exemplified by: book/books ([-s]), dog/dogs ([-z]), and bus/buses [-əz]). (Note that in
General American English [-əz]
is probably more common than the [-Èþz] you likely learned in English class. [-Èþz] is more common in
British English than in American.) You probably learned these
rules fairly early on in your study of English. These are phonological rules, because the
phonological structure of a word determines which type of plural
ending is added.
The same rules also apply to
adding the /-s/ marker
for possessives, e.g. Mark/Mark's,
Bob/Bob's and Trish/Trish's, as well as for the third person singular form of verbs,
as in take/takes, drag/drags, and push/pushes.
While anticipatory assimilation
is more common in English, as exemplified by the nasalization of
vowels that occur before nasal consonants, the rules for English
plurals, possessives, and third person singular verb forms offer
examples of perseverative assimilation,
in which a sound(s) is (are) influenced by sounds that occur before
it. In this case, the factors involved are voicing and sibilant consonants.
For an introduction to and
description of these rules in Chinese, please
read this article in Cave's English Teaching (CET ®v¼w) magazine,
Hello! ET:
¤j®v¶}Á¿ ¡X "-s" ©M "-ed" µü§À «ç»ò°á¡H in
No. 76, March/April 2013, p. 12-14 (pdf)
Here is a very succinct summary of
the plurals rules by a teacher of English in the Philippines.
Apparently Filipino students have the same tendency as Taiwan
students do, that of pronouncing all final s's in
spelling as [s].
(The rules are copied below in case the source page is removed,
as often happens with the Internet.)
http://www.englishforums.com/English/PluralOfNounsPronunciation/lxvg/Post.htm#58163
Re: Plural of nouns: Pronunciation.
In American English, the sound of "s" depends on which sound
comes before it.
1. If the noun ends in an unvoiced consonant sound: /f/, /k/,
/p/, /t/, /th/-(thin), pronounce "s" as /s/.
2. When it ends in a voiced consonant sound, /b/, /d/, /g/, /l/,
/m/, /n/, /ng/, /r/ or with a vowel sound, /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/,
/u/, pronounce "s" as /z/.
3. If it ends with /s/, /z/, /sh/, /ch/-chair, /zh/-the second
"g" in garage, /dz/-(j), pronounce "s" or "-es" as /iz/.
In other words, if the noun ends with a sound other than the 5
unvoiced consonants, pronounce "s" with a /z/ (or with an /iz/
as the case may be).
It is not only assimilation that is in
operation here. Its opposite, dissimilation,
is also at work. In assimilation, two sounds become more like
each other when they are in proximity. In dissimilation, just the
opposite happens: some kind of phonological change occurs in
order to make two sounds more distinct. In the case of
words ending in a sibilant, an epenthetic
("extra") schwa [ə] is
inserted in order to separate sounds that are phonetically
close. What sibilants have in common is that they are all
produced with a hissing sound. If similar hissing sounds are
pronounced in succession, e.g. bus + s [bʌss], the plural ending cannot be
clearly perceived by the listener. By assigning it a separate
syllable in which it is preceded by the neutral vowel, we can
hear the plural, possessive, or third person singular verb
marking clearly. This is an example of dissimilation
at work.
The pronunciation rules for
regular verbs marked for past tense and past participle (we'll
just say "past tense" here for simplicity) also involve both
perseverative assimilation and dissimilation. Using spelling as
a clue, we will assume the underlying plural marker to be /s/. In the case of the
regular past tense verb marker, we will assume the underlying
form to be /d/. As with
the plurals rules, /-d/
is devoiced when preceded by a voiceless sound, and maintains
its voicing when preceded by a voiced sound. But to obtain the
dissimilation rule, we must examine other features of the past
tense marker besides voicing. /d/
has no hissing sound, so the sibilant rule will not apply here.
Sounds classified as sibilants are based on both manner of articulation ¡V they are
all fricatives or affricates ¡V and
place of articulation ¡V all are either alveolar
or palato-alveolar sounds. If the same pattern applies to the
past tense marker, what kinds of sounds can we expect will
require a dissimilation rule? You may know the answer already,
but try to derive it anew by yourself on the basis of manner and
place of articulation. Please think about this carefully before
reading on.
/d/
is a stop, produced at the
alveolar ridge. What are the
alveolar stops in English? /d/
and /t/. And indeed, if
a verb ends in /d/ or /t/, we also add an
epenthetic [ə] schwa
before adding the final /d/
marking. But do we pronounce it [t] as in picked or [d] as in canned?
According to the rule of perseverative assimilation which
applies here, the final consonant should have the same voicing
value as the preceding sound. That sound in this case is a
schwa, which is a vowel, and vowels are voiced. So the
past tense of regular verbs ending in [d] or [t]
is [d], just as the plural
marking after sibilant consonants is [z] rather than [s].
The rules for regular English plurals for the past tense form of regular English
verbs are explained in these videos:
How to Pronounce Plural Nouns: American
English
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaFIejjqCoI
How to Pronounce -ed verb endings: American English
Pronunciation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7hi-ipU2n0
Contraction (page 32) and schwa
elision (page 33) both involve phonetic reduction. Another important kind
of phonetic reduction is the neutral
vowel or schwa.
We have thus far, including on this page, referred to schwas as
a given, without discussing in detail what a schwa actually is,
where the word schwa and
concept of the schwa originally came from, and the role of the
schwa in the rhythm of spoken English. We'll do this in the
following English Island article.
Next: Neutral Vowels (English
Island article)
on to next
page
back
index I
index
II home