¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
2012¦~7¤ë28¤é10:30
~ 12:00 |
||
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|26±Ð«Ç |
||
°Q½×ÃD¥Ø |
ÃD¥Ø |
§@ªÌ |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
Profits and
Losses from Currency Intervention |
Hailong Jin and E. Kwan Choi |
Working paper |
|
³ø§i¤H |
Kwan Choi |
||
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
Kwan Choi¡B¶ÀÂE¡BªL¿P²Q¡B¤ý¥ú¥¿¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B°ª°ê峯¡B³¯ª÷²±¡BÁé暳³®¡BªL©u¸©¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡BªL®Ë¦p¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡B¤Bi¤¯¡B±i§ÓÞ³¡B¶À«~¿þ¡B³\¦Ü¤A¡B¬IÎr¥þ |
||
ºKn |
This paper investigates the
possible gains from currency intervention by central banks using a two-period
framework in which a trade surplus in one period must be offset by a trade deficit
in the next period. It is shown that when the interest rate is zero, the
optimal policy is nonintervention. If the interest rate is positive, a
country may earn positive profits by incurring a trade surplus in the first
period. However, there is an upper bound for optimal trade surplus. A country
actually may lose money if the rate of devaluation below the equilibrium is
greater than the interest rate. A linear model suggests that China may have been
losing money from excessive devaluation of renminbi
since 2002. |