¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
|
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|²Ä27±Ð«Ç |
ÃD¥Ø |
The incentive for non-price
discrimination by an input monopolist |
§@ªÌ |
Nicholas
Economides |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
International Journal of Industrial Organization
(1998) |
³ø§i¤H |
°ª°ê峯 |
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE¡B±ç¤åºa¡B¤ý¥ú¥¿¡B³¯§»©ö¡B±i·ç¶³¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B°ª°ê峯¡B³¯ª÷²±¡B©P¦Bº½¡B´¿ÀRªK¡B½²©úªÚ¡BÒ\¥ú»õ¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡B¤Bi¤¯¡B±i§ÓÞ³¡B§f±o¦¨¡B¶À«~¿þ¡B³\¦Ü¤A¡B¬IÎr¥þ |
ºKn |
This paper considers the
incentive for non-price discrimination of a monopolist in an input market who
also sells in an oligopoly downstream market through a subsidiary. Such a
monopolist can raise the costs of the rivals to its subsidiary though
discriminatory quality degradation. I find that the monopolist always, even
when it is cost-disadvantaged, has the incentive to raise the costs of the
rivals to its subsidiary in a discriminatory fashion, but does not have
the incentive to raise costs to the whole downstream industry including its subsidiary.
Moreover, increasing rivals¡¦ costs nullifies the effects of traditional
imputation floors, and prompts the creation of imputation floors that account
for the artificial costs imposed on downstream rivals. The results of this
paper raise concerns about the potentially anti-competitive effects of entry
of local exchange carriers in long distance service. The results may also
suggest the imposition of certain unbundling and technical specification disclosure
requirements to monopolists in high technology industries. |
³Æµù |
|