¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
2012¦~06¤ë23¤é
10:20 ~ 13:00 |
||
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥xÆW¤j¾ÇªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°| ²Ä26±Ð«Ç |
||
°Q½×ÃD¥Ø |
ÃD¥Ø |
§@ªÌ |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
Bundling, Quality Choice, and
Welfare |
Hui-Ling Chung |
|
|
³ø§i¤H |
Áé暳³® |
||
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
ªL¿P²Q¡B±ç¤åºa¡B§dªÛ¤å¡B¤ý¥ú¥¿¡B±i¥Á©¾¡BªL®Ë¦p¡B½²©úªÚ¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B°ª°ê峯¡B³¯ª÷²±¡B±i§Ó°¶¡B¤Bi¤¯¡BÁé暳³®¡B§f±o¦¨¡B§d©yÁ¾¡B¶À«~¿þ¡B³\¦Ü¤A¡B¬IÎr¥þ |
||
°Q½×´£n |
This paper
investigates the quality competition and the welfare effects of commodity
bundling by a multi-product firm in a vertically differentiated industry. We discuss two cases in which a
multi-product firm bundles a high (low) quality product against a low (high)
quality rival firm in the competitive market. |
||
°Q½×µ²ªG»P«ØÄ³ |
Within the
context of bundled high quality good, we show that bundling reduces the
quality level of competitive good produced by both firms and decreases the
consumer surplus and welfare. The main reason
is that multi-product firm uses bundling to extend its monopoly power to the
competitive market to take more profits from rival firm by means of lower its
own quality. In order to mitigate
the competition, the best response of rival firm is to further differentiate
the quality levels, which induces rival firm to bring down its own quality
level, too. On the
contrary, under the bundled low quality good case, bundling raises the
quality level of competitive good, enhances the consumer surplus, and may increase
the welfare. Although bundling alters the optimal quality level in the two cases,
there is no discrepancy in the two equilibrium quality differentiation of the
competitive market. |
||
³Æµù |
|
|
|