¬ã°Q¤é´Á

2012¦~06¤ë16¤é¤W¤È10:20 ~ 13:00

¬ã°Q¦aÂI

¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|²Ä26±Ð«Ç

°Q½×¤åÄm

ÃD¥Ø

§@ªÌ

¤åÄm¥X³B

Welfare-reducing mergers in differentiated oligopolies with free entry

Nisvan Erkal

Daniel Piccinin

Economic Record 2010

³ø§i¤H

´¿ÀRªK

°Ñ¥[¤H­û

¶ÀÂE¡BªL¿P²Q¡B³¯§»©ö¡B¤ý¥ú¥¿¡B±i¥Á©¾¡BªL®Ë¦p¡B±i·ç¶³¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B³¯ª÷²±¡B©P¦Bº½¡B´¿ÀRªK¡BÒ\¥ú»õ¡B±i§Ó°¶¡B¤B­i¤¯¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡BÁé暳³®¡B§f±o¦¨¡B©P«~¦°¡B¶À«~¿þ¡B³\¦Ü¤A¡B¬IÎr¥þ

½×¤å´£­n

  In the analysis of the effects of mergers, it is important to consider the impact of merger-generated efficiencies on the possibility of post-merger entry. Although antitrust authorities consider both merger-generated efficiencies and entry as factors which may counteract the negative effects of horizontal mergers, the link between them is not emphasized in their guidelines.

  In a model with endogenous entry and differentiated products, we have shown that the net effect on consumer welfare is dominated by cost efficiencies in the sense that consumer welfare is increasing in the level of cost efficiencies. Mergers which do not generate any cost savings strictly hurt consumer welfare. It is not necessarily desirable to have more entry because more entry following a merger implies that the merger-generated efficiencies were not sufficiently large. In fact, mergers which induce entry always harm consumer welfare whereas mergers which induce exit always improve consumer welfare.

¬ã¨s«ØÄ³

It is well-known that the mergers always occur when the market is less competitive. Thus, it is worth to note that the assumption of N firms which can either enter or exit the market is reasonable.

³Æµù