|
研討日期 |
|
||
|
研討地點 |
台大社會科學院26教室 |
||
|
討論題目 |
題目 |
作者 |
文獻出處 |
|
Comparative advantage and the pursuit of strategic trade policy |
David Collie and David de Meza |
EL (2003) |
|
|
報告人 |
吳定軒 |
||
|
參加人員 |
黃鴻、林燕淑、吳芝文、王光正、林晏如、張瑞雲、彭正浩、陳金盛、周冰瑤、曾靜枝、蔡明芳、王佳琪、王羿傑、呂得成、周品旭、吳宜謙、吳定軒、若郁雯、劉岡易、林寬郁、黃品錚、許至乙、施姵全 |
||
|
摘要 |
This note sets up a model, based on Brander and Spencer (1985), with two countries each with a single firm that exports all its output to a third market where the two firms compete as Cournot duopolists and suggests that as the country with the low-cost firm has most to gain from intervention, whatever the direction of the policy it adopts, the absolute value of the export subsidy/tax of the country with the low cost firm is larger than the absolute value of the export subsidy/tax of the country with the high cost firm. This is a generalization of the result in de Meza (1986) to allow for both normal and perverse demand functions. It is more general than the result of Bandyopadhyay (1997) since it allows the comparison of the trade policies of the two countries when one country uses an export subsidy and the other country uses an export tax. |
||