¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
2012¦~5¤ë5¤é12:00
~ 13:00 |
||
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|26±Ð«Ç |
||
°Q½×ÃD¥Ø |
ÃD¥Ø |
§@ªÌ |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
The informativeness of on-line advertising |
Greg Taylor |
||
³ø§i¤H |
±i§Ó°¶ |
||
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE¡B±ç¤åºa¡BªL¿P²Q¡B§dªÛ¤å¡BªL®Ë¦p¡B°ª°ê峯¡B³¯ª÷²±¡B½²©úªÚ¡B§f±o¦¨¡B¤Bi¤¯¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡B§d©yÁ¾¡B±i§Ó°¶¡B¶À«~¿þ¡B³\¦Ü¤A¡B¬IÎr¥þ |
||
ºKn |
p Sending general advertisements with inflationary claims may
attract additional visitors with whom an advertiser is poorly matched. This
is costly when ads are priced per-click because many visitors (clickers) will
not purchase. This renders per-click advertising particularly conducive to
the transmission of information via ads. The admissibility of information
depends not only on advertiser behaviour, but also upon consumers¡¦
interpretation of and trust in ads. In less conducive environments, consumers
quickly learn to place little stock in the claims they see advertised. This
mechanism undermines the ability of advertisers and consumers to communicate
under per-impression or per-sale fee structures. Consumers benefit from
increased informativeness, but distortions introduced by the market power
given to advertisers imply that society may be better-off with no information
transmission taking place. |