¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
|
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|26±Ð«Ç |
ÃD¥Ø |
Licensing a vertical product
innovation |
§@ªÌ |
Chang-Ying Li Jun-Mei Wang |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
Economic Record 2010 |
³ø§i¤H |
´¿ÀRªK |
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE¡B±ç¤åºa¡B³¯§»©ö¡B¤ý¥ú¥¿¡B±i¥Á©¾¡B´¿ÀRªK¡B©P¦Bº½¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B±i·ç¶³¡B²ø´_½å¡B©P«~¦°¡B±ä¥j¾s¡B®}¹t¡B°ª°ê峯¡B |
ºKn |
This paper
studies the case where an outside patent holder licenses its vertical product
innovation to two Cournot competitors. It is found
that, under a fixed-fee contract, the patent holder prefers exclusive
licensing. However, under a royalty or two-part tariff contract, the patent
holder favors non-exclusive licensing. Moreover, in contrast to the standard
argument by Kamien and Tauman,
it show that, from the perspective of the patentee, royalty licensing can be
superior to fixed-fee licensing, if the degree of innovation is small.
Two-part tariff licensing generates a monopoly outcome in the final market
and hence reduces both consumer surplus and social welfare, if the innovation
is low. |
³Æµù |
We
can analyze the optimal licensing contract under Bertrand competition as well
as Cournot competition by taking an uncovered
market into account. |