¬ã°Q¤é´Á

2010¦~9¤ë11¤é¤W¤È10:20 ~ 13:00

¬ã°Q¦aÂI

¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|²Ä26±Ð«Ç

°Q½×¤åÄm

ÃD¥Ø

§@ªÌ

¤åÄm¥X³B

A Theoretical Foundation of the Porter Hypothesis

Ambec and Barla

Economics Letters 2002 (75), 355-360.

³ø§i¤H

±i¥Á©¾

°Ñ¥[¤H­û

¶ÀÂE¡B¤ý¥ú¥¿¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B³¯§»©ö¡B´¿ÀRªK¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡B±ä¥j¾s¡B®}¹t¡B³\³Í«Â¡B°ª°ê峯¡BÄÁ暳³®¡B§d©yÁ¾¡B©P«~¦°¡B±i·ç¶³¡B©P¦Bº½¡B¤B­i¤¯¡BªL®Ë¦p¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡B±i¥Á©¾¡B½²©úªÚ¡BÒ\¥ú»õ¡B¬IÎr¥þ

½×¤å´£­n

¶Ç²Î²£·~¸gÀپDzz½×»{¬°­Y¬F©²³W©w¤@­ÓÄY®æªºÀô¹Òªk³W¡A±N¾É­P¼t°Óªº¥Í²£¦¨¥»´£°ª¡A¶i¦Ó¾É­P¼t°Ó¥~²¾¦Ü¨S¦³Àô¹Òªk³Wªº°ê®a¶i¦æ¥Í²£¡CPorter and van der lindea (1995)´£¥XPorter Hypothesis»{¬°¡AÄY®æªºÀô¹Òªk³W²V»¤¨Ï¼t°Ó¶i¦æ¬ãµo¡A¶i¦Ó­°§C¥Í²£¦¨¥»¡A©Ò¥H¼t°Ó¤£·|¦³¥~²¾ªº²{¶H¡CµM¦Ó¡A¹L¥hÅçÃÒPorter Hypothesis³£¬O¨Ï¥Î­Ó®×¬ã¨sªº¤èªk¦Ó±o¨ìµ²½×¡A¯Ê¥FÄYÂÔªº²z½×°ò¦¡C³o½g¤å³¹¬O¹B¥Î­«·s½Í§P(renegotiation)ªº²z½×¼Ò«¬¥HÅçÃÒPorter Hypothesisªº¥i¯à©Ê¡C¬ã¨sµ²ªGµo²{¡APorter Hypothesis¦³¥i¯à¦¨¥ß¡C

¬ã¨s«Øij

¦b¥»¤å¼Ò«¬ªº¥«³õµ²ºc¤¤¥u¦³¤@®a¼t°Ó¶i¦æ¥Í²£¬¡°Ê¥B°T®§¬O¤£§¹¥þªº¡A¥¼¨Ó¥i±N¥«³õµ²ºc§ï¦¨Âù¥e©Î¬O¹è¥e¡A¦P®É¬°¤F²¤Æ¼Ò«¬¡A¥i±N¸ê°T³]©w¬°§¹¥þ°T®§¡A¶i¦Ó¨D¸Ñ¤lÁɧ½§¹¬ü§¡¿Å¡C¦P®ÉÀ˵ø¦b§¡¿Åªº±¡ªp¤U¡APorter Hypothesis¬O§_¦¨¥ß©Î¬O§ä¥XPorter Hypothesis¦¨¥ßªº±ø¥ó¡C

³Æµù