¬ã°Q¤é´Á

2010¦~06¤ë19¤é  10:20 ~ 13:00

¬ã°Q¦aÂI

¥xÆW¤j¾ÇªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|   ²Ä26±Ð«Ç

°Q½×ÃD¥Ø

ÃD¥Ø

§@ªÌ

¤åÄm¥X³B

Optimal Cross Holding with Externalities and Strategic Interactions

Matthew J. Clayton and Bjorn N. Jorgensen

Journal of Business, 2005, vol.78, no. 4 pp.1505-1522

³ø§i¤H

Áé暳³®

°Ñ¥[¤H­û

¶ÀÂE  ±ç¤åºa  ³¯§»©ö  ªL¿P²Q  ²ø´_½å  ¼B«G§g  °ª°ê®p  ±ä¥j¾s  ´¿ÀRªK  ¤ý¬ý³Ç  ½²©úªÚ  ±i·ç¶³  ³\²Q媖  ±i¥Á©¾  Ò\¥ú»õ®}¹t  ´^¥¿¯E  ¤B­i¤¯  Áé暳³®  ¬IÎr¥þ  ªL®Ë¦p  ³¯ª÷²±

°Q½×´£­n

    Cross holding, defined as one firm having an equity position (long or short) in another firm, arises in various industries. This paper analyzes the role of cross holding among publicly traded firms that generate externalities. We analyze a two period setting where firms first choose equity positions in each other and second engage in operating activities that cause externalities.

°Q½×µ²ªG»P«Øij

Firms facing positive externalities optimally choose long equity positions to increase their profits. Firms facing negative externalities encounter a prisoner¡¦ dilemma, where each firm optimally chooses short positions in the first period, committing to a more aggressive operating stance that results in lower profits. In contrast to the prior literature, regulation restricting cross holdings reduces consumer surplus and economic welfare when the number of firms is fixed. However, such regulation can increase entry , improving new welfare.

 

©µ¦ù

ªu¥Î¦¹½g¥H¡§«ùªÑ¤è¦¡¶i¦æ²§·~µ²·ù¡¨ªº·§©À»P·f°â«áµ²·ù¼t°Ó´£¨Ñ§é¦©ªºÄ³ÃD¶i¦æµ²¦X¡A¥H¸ÑÄÀ¹q«H¨t²Î°Ó»P³q¸ô¥N²z°Óªºµ²·ùÁͶաA¶i¤@¨B¤ÀªR¼t°Ó¥æ¤e«ùªÑ¦p¦ó¼vÅT·f°â«áªº§é¦©¤Î·f°â¤U¼t°Óªºµ²·ù¦æ¬°¹ïªÀ·|ºÖ§Qªº¼vÅT¡C

³Æµù