¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
2010¦~06¤ë5¤é11:30 ~ 13:00 |
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|26±Ð«Ç |
ÃD¥Ø |
Licensing Contract in a Stackelberg Model |
§@ªÌ |
Luigi Filippini |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
The Manchester School(2005) |
³ø§i¤H |
¬IÎr¥þ |
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B½²©úªÚ¡B´¿ÀRªK¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡B±ä¥j©ë¡B²ø´_½å¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡B¼B«G§g¡B®}¹t¡BÒ\¥ú»õ¡B±i¥Á©¾¡BªL®Ë¦p¡BÄÁ暳³®¡B¬IÎr¥þ¡B¤Bi¤¯ |
ºKn |
In this paper, we study optimal linear
licensing and its social welfare implications
when the innovator (patentee)
is an insider that can make capacity/output
commitment so as to act as a Stackelberg leader
in the output
market. The findings are: (i)
The patentee¡¦s profit-maximizing licensing contract is a
royalty. (ii)
The optimal royalty
rate is greater
than the cost reduction attained by the
licensed technology and is increasing
in the number of competitors. (iii)
Optimal licensing maximizes the likelihood
of technology
transfer,
may reduce social welfare and always
makes consumers worse off. (iv)
The innovator benefits from capacity commitment, and the more competitive the output market, the greater the gains it makes by licensing. |
³Æµù |
|