¬ã°Q¤é´Á

2010¦~06¤ë5¤é11:30 ~ 13:00

¬ã°Q¦aÂI

¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|26±Ð«Ç

ÃD¥Ø

Licensing Contract in a Stackelberg Model

§@ªÌ

Luigi Filippini

¤åÄm¥X³B

The Manchester School(2005)

³ø§i¤H

¬IÎr¥þ

°Ñ¥[¤H­û

¶ÀÂE¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B½²©úªÚ¡B´¿ÀRªK¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡B±ä¥j©ë¡B²ø´_½å¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡B¼B«G§g¡B®}¹t¡BÒ\¥ú»õ¡B±i¥Á©¾¡BªL®Ë¦p¡BÄÁ暳³®¡B¬IÎr¥þ¡B¤B­i¤¯

ºK­n

In this paper, we study optimal linear licensing and its social welfare implications when the innovator (patentee) is an insider that can make capacity/output commitment so as to act as a Stackelberg leader in the output market.

The findings are:

(i)                                        The patentee¡¦s profit-maximizing licensing contract is a royalty.  

(ii)                 The optimal royalty rate is greater than the cost reduction attained by the licensed technology and is increasing in the number of competitors.

(iii)                Optimal licensing maximizes the likelihood of technology transfer, may reduce social welfare and always makes consumers worse off.

(iv)                The innovator benefits from capacity commitment, and the more competitive the output market, the greater the gains it makes by licensing.

 

³Æµù