¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
|
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|23±Ð«Ç |
ÃD¥Ø |
Strategic
Voting in Open Primary |
§@ªÌ |
K.P. Chen and S. Z.Yang |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
Public Choice, 1-30, 2002 |
³ø§i¤H |
³\²Q媖 |
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE ±ç¤åºa ¤ý¥ú¥¿ ªL¿P²Q ¤ý¬ý³Ç °ª°ê®p ³\²Q媖
±i·ç¶³ ´^¥¿¯E Ò\¥ú»õ ¤Bi¤¯ ªL®Ë¦p ÄÁáJ³® ½²©úªÚ ³¯ª÷²± ¬IÎr¥þ »uªl¼Ý |
ºKn |
The purpose of an open primary is to incorporate more
moderate votes into the primary elections. This intention may backfire when
nonparty members strategically participate in the primary, and the result of
an open primary might become even more extreme than when non party members are
not allowed to participate. Realizing this, the party members might also vote
strategically to counter-react. If this occurs, then it might actually
coordinate the votes of the party's supporters. The effect of strategic
voting behavior on the result of a primary depends on the size of the party,
turnout rate of nonparty members, the positions of the candidates and the
proportion of voters who vote strategically. Strategic voting behavior can sometimes
improve social welfare. |
³Æµù |
|