¬ã°Q¤é´Á

2010¦~3¤ë6¤é10:20 ~ 13:00

¬ã°Q¦aÂI

¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|¹q¤Æ±Ð«Ç

ÃD¥Ø

Comparing Cournot and Bertrand equilirbia in a differentiated duopoly with product R&D

§@ªÌ

George Symeonidis

¤åÄm¥X³B

International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21,p39-55

³ø§i¤H

ªL®Ë¦p

°Ñ¥[¤H­û

¶ÀÂE    ±ç¤åºa    ³¯§»©ö    ¤ý¬ý³Ç    ½²©úªÚ    Ò\¥ú»õ    ´¿ÀRªK    ³¯ª÷²±    ´^¥¿¯E    ¤ý¨ÎµX    ¤B­i¤¯    ¤ý¥ú¥¿    °ª°ê峯    »uªl¼Ý    ªL®Ë¦p    ©P¦Bº½    ±i·ç¶³    ÄÁáJ³®    ±i¥Á©¾    ¬IÎr¥þ

ºK­n

This paper compares Bertrad and Cournot equilibria in a differentiated duopoly with substitute goods and product R&D. Firms invest in R&D in order to enhance product quality. Quality increases the consumers¡¦ willingness to pay for the firm¡¦s variety, but it comes at a cost. The competition in the industry is described by a two-stage game. At stage 1 each firm chooses a variety. At stage 2 the firms set quantities or prices. This paper find that R&D expenditure, prices and firms¡¦ net profits are always higher under quantity competition than under price competition. Further more, if R&D spillover are strong and products are not too differentiated, then output, consumer surplus and total welfare are lower in the Bertrand case than in the Cournot case.

³Æµù

¦b¥»¤å¤¤, R&Dªº¥~·¸®ÄªG°Ñ¼Æ¬O¼Ò«¬³]©wªºÃöÁä¡A·í¥~·¸®ÄªG¤£°÷¤j®É¡A«hCournotÄvª§¤UªºªÀ·|ºÖ§Q¸ûBertrandÄvª§°ªªºµ²ªG¥i¯à¤£¦s¦b¡C