¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
|
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|¹q¤Æ±Ð«Ç |
ÃD¥Ø |
Comparing
Cournot and Bertrand equilirbia
in a differentiated duopoly with product R&D |
§@ªÌ |
George Symeonidis |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
International Journal of Industrial
Organization, 2003, 21,p39-55 |
³ø§i¤H |
ªL®Ë¦p |
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE ±ç¤åºa ³¯§»©ö ¤ý¬ý³Ç ½²©úªÚ Ò\¥ú»õ ´¿ÀRªK ³¯ª÷²± ´^¥¿¯E ¤ý¨ÎµX ¤Bi¤¯ ¤ý¥ú¥¿ °ª°ê峯 »uªl¼Ý ªL®Ë¦p ©P¦Bº½ ±i·ç¶³ ÄÁáJ³® ±i¥Á©¾ ¬IÎr¥þ |
ºKn |
This paper compares Bertrad
and Cournot equilibria in
a differentiated duopoly with substitute goods and product R&D. Firms invest
in R&D in order to enhance product quality. Quality increases the
consumers¡¦ willingness to pay for the firm¡¦s variety, but it comes at a cost.
The competition in the industry is described by a two-stage game. At stage 1
each firm chooses a variety. At stage 2 the firms set quantities or prices.
This paper find that R&D expenditure, prices and firms¡¦ net profits are
always higher under quantity competition than under price competition.
Further more, if R&D spillover are strong and products are not too
differentiated, then output, consumer surplus and total welfare are lower in
the Bertrand case than in the Cournot case. |
³Æµù |
¦b¥»¤å¤¤, R&Dªº¥~·¸®ÄªG°Ñ¼Æ¬O¼Ò«¬³]©wªºÃöÁä¡A·í¥~·¸®ÄªG¤£°÷¤j®É¡A«hCournotÄvª§¤UªºªÀ·|ºÖ§Q¸ûBertrandÄvª§°ªªºµ²ªG¥i¯à¤£¦s¦b¡C |