¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
|
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|¹q¤Æ±Ð«Ç |
ÃD¥Ø |
The
Cournot-Bertrand profit differential: A reversal result in a differentiated
duopoly with wage bargaining |
§@ªÌ |
Monica Correa Lopez,
Robin A. Naylor |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
European Economic Review,48, 681-696, 2004 |
³ø§i¤H |
´¿ÀRªK |
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
±ç¤åºa ³¯§»©ö §dªÛ¤å ªL¿P²Q °ª°ê峯 ½²©úªÚ ¤ý¨ÎµX ¤ý¬ý³Ç »uªl¼Ý ±i¥Á©¾ ¿à¼z¬À ´^¥¿¯E ´¿ÀRªK ªL®Ë¦p ³¯ª÷²± Ò\¥ú»õ ¤Bi¤¯ ¬IÎr¥þ |
ºKn |
This paper compares Cournot and Bertrand
equilibria in a downstream differentiated duopoly in which the input price
(wage) paid by each downstream firm is the outcome of a strategic bargain
with its upstream supplier (labor union). We show that the standard result
that Cournot equilibrium profits exceed those under Bertrand competition ¡V
when the differentiated duopoly game is played in imperfect substitutes ¡V is
reversible. Whether equilibrium profits are higher under Cournot or Bertrand
competition is shown to depend upon the nature of the upstream agents¡¦
preferences and on the distribution of bargaining power over the input price.
We find that the standard result holds unless unions are both powerful and
place considerable weight on the wage argument in their utility function. |
³Æµù |
Cournot Ävª§»P Bertrand Ävª§ªº§Q¼í¤ÏÂ൲ªG¡A¤w¸g¦³³\¦h¬J¦³¤åÄm¥i±o¦¹¤@µ²ªG¡C¦Ó¥»¤åÃÒ©ú¦¹¤@µ²ªG¥²¶·¦b«D±`¯S®í±¡ªp¤U¤~·|¦¨¥ß¡A¦ü¥G¤ñ¸û¤£¦³½ì¡CYCournot »P Bertrand ¨âªÌÄvª§«¬ºA¤§¶¡ªº»ù®æ®t²§¡BºÖ§Q®t²§¤]¥i¥H±o¨ì¤ÏÂ઺µ²ªG¡A·|§ó¥[¦³½ì¡C |