¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
2009¦~11¤ë21¤é10:10 ~ 13:00 |
||
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|¹q¤Æ±Ð«Ç |
||
°Q½×ÃD¥Ø |
ÃD¥Ø |
§@ªÌ |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
Market power, price discrimination, and allocative efficiency in intermediate-goods markets |
Roman Inderst and Greg Shaffer |
RAND Journal of Economics Vol. 40, No. 4, Winter 2009 pp. 658¡V672 |
|
³ø§i¤H |
³¯ª÷²± |
||
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B§dªÛ¤å¡B±i·ç¶³¡B°ª°ê峯¡B§d¥@³Ç¡B¤ý¨ÎµX¡B³¯¨Ø¹a¡B½²©úªÚ¡BªL®Ë¦p¡B±i¥Á©¾¡B§õ´Â¥\¡B©P«~¦°¡B§d©yÁ¾¡B¤Bi¤¯¡B³¯ª÷²±¡B¬IÎr¥þ |
||
ºKn |
This paper considers a monopolistic supplier¡¦s
optimal choice of two-part tariff contracts when downstream firms are
asymmetric. We find that the optimal discriminatory contracts amplify
differences in downstream firms¡¦ competitiveness. Firms that are
larger¡Xeither because they are more efficient or because they sell a superior
product¡Xobtain a lower wholesale price than their rivals. This increases
allocative efficiency by favoring the more productive firms. In contrast, we
show that a ban on price discrimination reduces allocative efficiency and can
lead to higher wholesale prices for all firms. As a result, consumer surplus,
industry profits, and welfare are lower. |