¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
|
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥x¤jªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°|¹q¤Æ±Ð«Ç |
ÃD¥Ø |
Downstream
Competition, Bargaining, and Welfare |
§@ªÌ |
George Symeonidis |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,17,
247-270, 2008 |
³ø§i¤H |
´¿ÀRªK |
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
«À¤¯¼w¡B±d§ÊÀ®¡BªL¿P²Q¡B§d¥@³Ç¡B³¯§»©ö¡B½²©úªÚ¡B±ç¤åºa¡B´¿ÀRªK¡B³\²Q媖¡B¤ý¬ý³Ç¡B°ª°ê峯¡B³¯¨Ø¬Â¡B´^¥¿¯E¡B§d©yÁ¾¡B©P«~¦°¡BÁé暳³®¡B³¯ª÷²±¡B¬IÎr¥þ¡B¤Bi¤¯¡B§õ´Â¥\ |
ºKn |
This paper analyzes the effects of downstream
competition when there is bargaining between downstream firms and upstream
agents (firms or unions). When bargaining is over a uniform input price, a
decrease in the intensity of competition (or a merger) between downstream
firms may raise consumer surplus and overall welfare. When bargaining is over
a two-part tariff, a decrease in the intensity of competition reduces
downstream profits and upstream utility and raises consumer surplus and
overall welfare. Standard welfare results of oligopoly theory can be
reversed: less competition can be unprofitable for firms and/or beneficial
for consumers and society as a s whole. |
³Æµù |
|