¬ã°Q¤é´Á |
2009¦~6¤ë27¤é¤W¤È10:20 ~ |
||
¬ã°Q¦aÂI |
¥xÆW¤j¾ÇªÀ·|¬ì¾Ç°| ¹q¤Æ±Ð«Ç |
||
°Q½×¤åÄm |
ÃD¥Ø |
§@ªÌ |
¤åÄm¥X³B |
Distorted
Gravity: |
Thomas Chaney |
American Economic Review, 2008 |
|
³ø§i¤H |
±d§ÊÀ® |
||
°Ñ¥[¤Hû |
¶ÀÂE ±ç¤åºa §dªÛ¤å ±d§ÊÀ® ¤ý¥ú¥¿ ½²©úªÚ ´¿ÀRªK °ª°ê峯 ±i¥Á©¾ ´^¥¿¯E ªL¤j¶v ÄÁáJ³® Ò\¥ú»õ ³¯§»©ö §õ´Â¥\ ¤Bi¤¯ ³¯¥É®Ë ©P«~¦° ªL®Ë¦p §d©yÁ¾ |
||
½×¤å´£n |
Introducing firm heterogeneity leaves many of the
predictions of the Krugman (1980) model of
international trade unaffected. Most important, the gravity structure of
bilateral trade flows is preserved. In this paper, I have identified a key
difference between the Krugman model with representative
firms and a model with firm heterogeneity. The impact of trade barriers is
dampened by the elasticity of substitution, and not magnified by it. I
introduce fixed export costs and adjustments on the extensive margin in a
simple model of international trade. A high elasticity of substitution
translates productivity differences into large differences in size. As firm
sizes get more dispersed, fixed costs have a lesser impact on exports: large
firms can easily overcome those fixed costs. Aggregate trade flows are less
sensitive to trade barriers when goods are more substitutable. |
||
¬ã¨s«ØÄ³ |
|