研討日期 |
2006年1月14日上午10:30
~ 1:30 |
||
研討地點 |
台大社會科學院第2教室 |
||
討論文獻 |
題目 |
作者 |
文獻出處 |
Voting, spatial monopoly
and spatial price regulation |
M Ye and M Yezer |
Economic Inquiry, Jan,
1992, 29-39 |
|
報告人 |
許淑媖 |
||
參加人員 |
王光正、王胤杰、冰瑤、吳芝文、李玫郁、李家銘、李揚、林晏如、林燕淑
、 邱俊榮、胡均立、高國峰、涂光億、張民忠、梁文榮、許淑女英、陳宏易、陳盈秀、陳疆平、彭正浩、曾靜枝、黃鴻、蔡明芳 |
||
討論提要 |
The
major object of this study is the effect of regulations controlling the level
of transportation cost absorption. Given that welfare is maximized at zero
absorption and firm profit is maximized at spatial price discrimination, it
is curious that regulations commonly require that the monopolist set uniform delivered
price. |
||
結論 |
Regulations often require that local public
utilities engage in high rates of freight absorption. These regulations are
shown to arise logically as a consequence of self-interest voting behavior. Consumer
may change their delivered price by voting to require a rate of freight
absorption Voting outcomes under a median voter model predict the high rate
of freight absorption often observed in practice |
||
延伸研究 |
This
tool provided by this paper is immediately applicable to many issues. |
||
備註 |
|